Neobanks, brokers, exchanges, custodians - we ship beautiful compliant platforms that move real money.
4–6 active engagements at a time · Starting from $25K
02
Selected Work
50+ platforms built.
Exchanges, brokers, lending desks, staking, arbitrage — the clients are anonymous. The outcomes aren't.
FIG · MATCHING ENGINE
DERIVATIVES EXCHANGE · 2019
Derivatives exchange built end-to-end. Spot, perps, single-digit ms matching.
HFT exchange platform from scratch — matching engine, risk system, position keeper, settlement layer. Cross-region failover and a complete order audit log.
E2ESpot + Perps< 10ms p99
FIG · BROKER STACK
FX BROKER PLATFORM · 2023
FX broker platform built end-to-end. Crypto rails native from day one.
Full broker stack from scratch — OMS, risk engine, deposit and withdrawal rails, reporting. A JIT-forwarder design kept crypto outside the dealing license.
Liquidity MgmtSpot FXMainlabel
FIG · LIQUIDATION
CRYPTO LENDING · 2019
$6M loan book. Zero defaults across 14 months.
Centralized lending desk for secured digital asset loans. Continuous collateral monitoring across BTC, ETH, and TRON, with automated margin calls and liquidations.
$6M loan bookALM built-inNo bad debts
FIG · COPYTRADE
COPYTRADE & SOCIAL TRADING · 2023
20k follower events a day. Zero settlement incidents in 18 months.
Leader signals propagate to follower accounts in real time. Position sizing, fee splits, and risk caps applied automatically on every fill.
20k events/day0 incidents18 mo. live
FIG · ARBITRAGE
ARBITRAGE BOT · 2021
Triangular arb across the deepest-liquidity venues. 11ms median execution.
Cross-venue execution bot running spatial and triangular strategies. Operated against Binance, Huobi, Kraken, Gate, and FTX (pre-collapse).
5 venues11ms median11 TPS
FIG · STAKING
EARN & STAKING PROGRAMME · 2020
Earn-and-staking programme built end-to-end. $30M staked over 22 months.
Earn-and-staking platform designed and built end-to-end for a regulated client. Validator selection, rewards, and unbonding all handled internally — one balance, one dashboard.
Designed + built$30M stakedBTC + ETH
03
What we ship
Three services. One clear path.
Most projects start with the diagnostic. Some skip to the build — if you've already scoped it.The difference is whether you're starting fresh or inheriting something.
Recommended
Entry · Service
Architecture Diagnostic
$25,000 · 2 weeks
Two weeks. Four deliverables. One fixed price. Reference architecture, jurisdiction memo, threat model, and a fixed-scope build estimate. You keep everything either way.
01Reference architecture
02Jurisdiction memo
03Threat model
04Build estimate
Expansion · Service
Launch Engagement
From $80K · 3–6 months
The full build, scoped from your diagnostic. A senior engineering team owns it end-to-end. Working software in week two. Weekly milestones. Fixed scope.
Continuation · Service
Fractional CTO
From $15K/mo · By invitation
Senior engineering ownership after launch. One dedicated senior engineer — not a ticket queue. On-call response, quarterly reviews, regulatory advisory. Reserved for clients we've already shipped with.
By invitation only
Parallel · Product
Non-custodial Wallet as a Service
from $1.5k/mo · 2 weeks
Deposit infrastructure for TRON, EVM, BTC. JIT-forwarder contracts, xpub-derived addresses, sub-second detection. Self-serve. Originally built for our own client deposits — now available standalone.
04
Compliance
Ship compliant. Stay compliant.
KYC, sanctions screening, on-chain monitoring — wired in from day one, not bolted on after launch.We've integrated the major compliance vendors across APAC and EU jurisdictions, and we advise on what regulators will actually accept.
Integrations we have shipped or evaluated
Module
Integration · Service
Compliance Integration
From $45,000 · 4–6 weeks
The compliance stack your jurisdiction requires, wired in and tested. Vendor selection, integration, and an operations dashboard your team can actually run.
01Jurisdictional applicability memo
02KYC / KYB integration
03Sanctions + PEP screening
04Wallet screening + KYT
05Travel Rule wiring
06Compliance ops dashboard
Ongoing · Retainer
Compliance Watch
From $6K/mo · ongoing
Live coverage after launch. Rule updates as regulations move, flagged alerts with a response commitment, and a quarterly readiness review your auditor can read.
–Rule updates per jurisdiction
–Alert triage SLA
–Quarterly regulator-readiness review
–Vendor licenses pass through at cost
Vendor license fees (Sumsub, Chainalysis, TRM Labs, Crystal, World-Check One) pass through to the client at cost. Jurisdictional applicability is scoped per engagement.
Vendor license fees pass through at cost. Jurisdictional applicability scoped per engagement.
05
How we think
Most platforms don't need custody. They need deposit processing.
Most founders make this decision with a vendor in the room. You shouldn't have to. The table below is the same framework our diagnostic uses — judgment first, vendor-neutral, scoped to your actual constraints. Use it whether or not we work together.
Custodial MPC vendor
Fireblocks, Cobo, BitGo, Safeheron
Who holds the keysVendor holds keys
Time to go live4–8 weeks
Minimum monthly cost$5–50K+
Setup with NinebrightFrom $25K
Vendor lock-inHigh
Custodial license requiredYes
Recommended for most
Non-custodial deposit infra
JIT-forwarder + xpub (our WaaS)
Who holds the keysYou hold keys
Time to go liveUnder 1 week
Minimum monthly cost$1.5k
Setup with NinebrightFrom $10K · or self-serve
Vendor lock-inNone
Custodial license requiredNo
In-house engineering
Hire and build with your own team
Who holds the keysYou hold keys
Time to go live3–6 months
Minimum monthly costSalary cost
Setup with Ninebright—
Vendor lock-inNone
Custodial license requiredNo
Applies to platforms that pool and collect deposits on behalf of users — exchanges, brokers, neobanks, custodians. DeFi protocols and embedded wallet products (Privy, Web3Auth) are a different architecture.
We integrate Fireblocks, Cobo, and Safeheron when custody is genuinely required — that determination is part of what the diagnostic produces. We won't sell custody to platforms that don't need it, and we won't build custody infrastructure we believe you shouldn't be running.
We won't sell custody to platforms that don't need it. We won't build infrastructure we believe you shouldn't be running.
06
Why we exist
Most banking apps feel identical. We don't think they should.
I started this firm because money is the one product no one opts out of — and yet only a third of people find their bank app unique. Finance has fewer moves than any industry: save, send, spend, borrow, invest. Each one deserves to feel like something, not just functional.
Crypto cracked the design ceiling. The lines between traditional and decentralised finance are blurring. The future of finance is open and permissionless through transparent savings and credit for anyone with a phone, without discrimination.
That future starts with delightful crafts in finance. So we're building them.
— Matthew Prag, Founder
5
core banking features are what most banks focus on — social commerce ships dozens
Banking apps cluster at 3–7 core actions: balance, transfer, deposit, pay bill, invest. Social and commerce platforms ship dozens — live-streaming, social reviews, gamified rewards, AI-driven discovery. Most banking “advanced” features rate as merely average to 60% of users.
of UK ISA holders go beyond cash, the rest just save
Only 5.4M of 17.9M ISA holders hold stocks & shares. The other 12.5M sit in cash — not by preference, but because no app made the upgrade feel worth it. The design gap between saving and growing is a product failure, not a user one.
Lloyds Banking Group, 2026
8.41%
APAC retail wealth CAGR — fastest growing, yet < 15% active in growth products
HNWIs hold 42.74% of the $27.57T APAC wealth market, but retail is the fastest-growing segment at 8.41% CAGR. The gap: most retail wealth sits in deposits and property. Superior mobile experiences are the unlock — not product availability.
Mordor Intelligence, 2025
<10%
of users in developing economies grow their money — even as 75% hold an account
75% have an account → 62% use it to move money → 40% use it to save → <10% use it to grow money. The funnel breaks at the last step. Mobile-first apps like TnG eWallet (Malaysia) are closing the gap through superior experiences, not superior products.